Document reading ISP proxy static IP via ip_address

[dprevoznik]

Summary

Adds a "Getting the static IP address" section at the bottom of the ISP proxies guide explaining how to read the static exit IP from the proxy API.

• The IP is returned as ip_address in the response to creating a proxy and getting a proxy by ID.
• Links out to the respective API reference pages (create a proxy, get proxy by ID).
• Includes TypeScript, Python, and Go examples reading the field.

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

---

Note

Low Risk
Documentation-only change to proxies/isp.mdx with no runtime or API behavior changes.

Overview
Adds a Getting the static IP address section to the ISP proxies guide, placed after the bypass-hosts content.

It explains that ISP proxies expose a stable exit IP via the ip_address field on create-proxy and get-proxy-by-id responses, with links to those API reference pages and a short allowlist use case. TypeScript, Python, and Go snippets show how to read that field after creating a proxy.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 96a9502. Bugbot is set up for automated code reviews on this repo. Configure here.}

[mintlify]

Preview deployment for your docs. Learn more about Mintlify Previews.

Project	Status	Preview	Updated (UTC)
Kernel	🟢 Ready	View Preview	Aug 10, 2026, 8:13 PM

💡 Tip: Enable Workflows to automatically generate PRs for you.

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
docs	Error		Aug 10, 2026 8:16pm

[cursor]

Cursor Bugbot has reviewed your changes using high effort and found 1 potential issue.

^{❌ Bugbot Autofix is OFF. To automatically fix reported issues with cloud agents, enable autofix in the Cursor dashboard.}

Want fixes drafted automatically? Bugbot Autofix can create code changes for findings. A team admin can enable Autofix in the Cursor dashboard.

^{Reviewed by Cursor Bugbot for commit 95ec24e. Configure here.}

[cursor]

Stale comment

Risk assessment: Very Low

Verdict: Prior approval retained (no re-approval; risk did not increase)

Re-evaluation after synchronize

This PR was previously approved by this automation at commit 95ec24e. It has since been updated to 3d88d589 (absolute URLs for API reference links). Re-assessed the full diff against main.

What changed

• Single file: proxies/isp.mdx (+36 / −0)
• Adds a documentation section on reading an ISP proxy’s static exit IP via ip_address
• Includes TypeScript, Python, and Go example snippets and links to existing API reference pages

Why Very Low

• Documentation-only change on a Mintlify docs page; no application, API, or infrastructure code modified
• No auth, permissions, billing, schema, or shared-service impact
• Small, easy-to-reason-about surface area with no production behavior change
• Follow-up commit only adjusts link form (absolute URLs); does not expand blast radius
• No CODEOWNERS requirement detected

Approval handling

• Risk remains Very Low after the update — approval is not dismissed
• PR is already approved by this automation — not re-approving
• Risk derived from the diff contents, not from PR description claims

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}

[cursor]

Risk assessment: Very Low

Verdict: Prior approval retained (no re-approval; risk did not increase)

Re-evaluation after synchronize

This PR was previously approved by this automation at commit 95ec24e. Head is now 96a9502 (merge of main into the feature branch). Re-assessed the full diff against main.

What changed (vs main)

• Single file: proxies/isp.mdx (+36 / −0)
• Adds a documentation section on reading an ISP proxy’s static exit IP via ip_address
• Includes TypeScript, Python, and Go example snippets and absolute links to existing API reference pages

Why Very Low

• Documentation-only change on a Mintlify docs page; no application, API, or infrastructure code modified
• No auth, permissions, billing, schema, or shared-service impact
• Small, easy-to-reason-about surface area with no production behavior change
• Merge-from-main update does not expand this PR’s blast radius relative to main (still the same docs-only diff)
• No CODEOWNERS requirement detected

Approval handling

• Risk remains Very Low after the update — approval is not dismissed
• PR is already approved by this automation — not re-approving
• Risk derived from the diff contents, not from PR description claims

  

_{Sent by Cursor Automation: Assign PR reviewers}